Printed from: http://www.seccom.govt.nz/publications/documents/austraclear/05.shtml?print=true on Wed 25 November 2009

Reserve Bank of New Zealand.

ESAS Austraclear NZ
Electronic Registry Interface

 

2.0

Overview: Proposed Electronic Transfer System


2.1
Background

All securities settled in Austraclear must be transferred (lodged) into NZCSD before they can be settled in the Austraclear NZ system, requiring a transfer of ownership of the security from the beneficial owner to NZCSD on the respective registry and the entry of the relevant information in Austraclear. Alternatively a security must be transferred (uplifted) out of NZCSD before the member can settle the security outside of Austraclear, requiring an update to the relevant Austraclear information and a transfer of ownership of the security from NZCSD to the beneficial owner on the respective registry.

On average, there are 400 security transfers in to and out of NZCSD each day, each requiring an associated "lodge" or "uplift" transactions to be processed within Austraclear. These 400 transactions must also be completed either through the NZX FASTER system or directly with the Registrar of the relevant security (non-FASTER), to complete the ownership change of the security (in to or out of NZCSD's name).

These security transfer transactions are completed via:
  1. Manual data entry,
  2. Completion of paper transfer forms, and
  3. Communication via fax, email or telephone.
Because this process is largely manual and paper based, it is relatively inefficient, prone to error, extremely time consuming, and is frustrating for Members, the registries, the system operator and the financial markets. Currently the time to complete a lodge or uplift transaction in Austraclear and for completion of the associated security transfer on the relevant registry is one hour, but can often take longer depending on processing at the registry. This delay causes issues for members as the security is immobilised in Austraclear until the security transfer is completed. In addition, the delay also limits the amount of time available for members to complete settlements linked to the relevant security.

To address the inefficiencies, issues and costs associated with the current process used for transferring securities directly between NZCSD and the various registries i.e. non-FASTER transferable, it is proposed to implement an electronic security transfer system between Austraclear and the relevant registries in New Zealand. This electronic transfer system will replace the current manual processes with a completely electronic process for non-FASTER transferable securities.

The new electronic process will capture all the relevant transfer information entered by the Member in Austraclear for the relevant lodge or uplift, format that information into a SWIFT message and then send that message to the relevant registry in New Zealand over the existing ESAS-Austraclear NZ network (requiring the registrar to be a member of the Austraclear NZ system). While the new electronic transfer system will effectively just replace the current manual paper based process (although it will be possible to revert to the current process at any time), it does offer many advantages and improvements:

2.2
Process Flow: Manual vs. Electronic

The diagram below illustrates the current process whereby a security is lodged into the name of NZCSD on the Registry with no FASTER interaction.

Those tasks detailed in blue are the aspects of this process that we propose to automate.

Those tasks detailed in red (and underlined) are the aspects of this process that we propose to remove entirely.

Those tasks detailed in red - and underlined - are the aspects of this process that we propose to remove entirely.


 
2.2.2 Uplift of Securities from NZCSD on the Register:

The diagram below illustrates the current process whereby a security is uplifted out of the name of NZCSD on the Registry with no FASTER interaction.

Those tasks detailed in blue are the aspects of this process that we propose to automate.

Those tasks detailed in red (and underlined) are the aspects of this process that we propose to remove entirely.

Those tasks detailed in red - and underlined - are the aspects of this process that we propose to remove entirely.


2.3
Transaction Transmission

The existing Austraclear transaction input screen will be redesigned to accommodate information previously contained within the paper transfer form.

The Austraclear member will input all mandatory information and submit the transaction.

Upon submission, the data for each lodge/uplift transaction will be formatted into a separate SWIFT compliant message file and transmitted electronically to the Registry. This transmission will be completed using Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) which uses the security provided by SSH (Secure Shell).

When the file is pushed to the Registry, a response will be received immediately to recognise failure or acknowledge successful receipt of the transaction.

Assuming the file transfer has been successful, the transaction will be uploaded into the Registry system and a response, in the form of a SWIFT compliant message file, will be returned to Austraclear. This response will be transmitted using the same protocol and algorithm and will confirm either a successful transfer or detail the reason for transfer failure.

Upon receipt of the Registry response, Austraclear will upload the file and the transaction process will be auto-completed.

2.4
Transaction Identification

Each eligible lodge/uplift transaction , when submitted within Austraclear will be given a Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI).

This UTI will be used throughout the transmission process (i.e. within the files sent by both Austraclear and the Registry system) and will serve the following purposes: Transactions will be retained and stored on both the Austraclear and the Registry systems so that they meet or exceed the relevant legal requirements.

2.5
Transaction Failure

Full alert notifications and access to view the transactions 'below the surface' via existing functionality will be utilised to inform RBNZ and/or Registry staff of potential issues and assist in the issue diagnosis.

There are several potential points of failure in the file transmission process: These points of failure will be rectified by one of the following: It will be the responsibility of Austraclear staff to ensure that all transactions are complete at the end of each day and this will be built into current operating procedures.

* In these scenarios the legal ownership has changed as per the transfer/request form.


 

...PREV | CONTENTS | ENDS