for which only projections can be given.
The Financial Reporting Standards do not provide clear guidance on this point and the Commission referred this matter to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand (ICANZ).
Corporate governance issues
There was some confusion as to the role of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), as financial adviser to Vertex, concerning PwCs responsibilities in relation to the prospective financial information. Clear lines of communication at the appropriate levels were not apparent on this issue.
There is currently no professional guidance for auditors concerning their role in engagements that involve an examination of prospective financial information.
The Commission has referred to ICANZ the question of whether such guidance is desirable.
There was a lack of understanding by several Vertex directors about the options for presenting the prospective financial information required in the offer documents. In particular, some directors did not appear to know that prospective financial information in a prospectus can be presented as either a forecast or a projection.
In addition, there were deficiencies in communication of information about the performance of the individual business units from management to the Vertex Board.
The Commission did not find evidence to suggest that the directors of Vertex believed the offer document was misleading. Nor did it find evidence to suggest that at the date of allotment the directors knew the offer document was misleading.
The report is available at www.seccom.govt.nz.